| Aspect | Unit Testing | Integration Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Individual functions or modules | Interaction between modules |
| Performed By | Developers (mostly) | Developers and testers |
| Tools | JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, PyTest | Postman, Selenium, JUnit/TestNG (integration setups) |
| Goal | Ensure correctness of each small unit | Ensure modules work together |
| Execution Stage | Early during coding | After unit tests and before system testing |
Topic: Unit Testing vs Integration Testing
Unit Testing
- Focuses on testing individual components such as functions, classes, or methods.
- Ensures each piece of code works correctly in isolation.
- Commonly automated with frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, NUnit, or PyTest.
Example
- Testing a method that calculates the total price of items in a shopping cart.
Integration Testing
- Focuses on testing interactions between components or systems.
- Ensures that modules work together correctly after integration.
- Can be executed using approaches such as Postman or Selenium alongside test frameworks.
-
Types of integration testing:
- Big Bang: integrate all modules at once and test the combined system.
- Incremental: integrate and test step by step, including Top-Down, Bottom-Up, and Sandwich strategies.
Example
- Testing how the shopping cart module interacts with the payment gateway module.
Key Differences
Why Both Are Important
- Unit testing catches bugs early in small pieces of code.
- Integration testing confirms those units work correctly when combined.
- Running both reduces defect leakage to higher testing phases.